Posts Tagged ‘Formalities’

It’s Easier, it’s Cheaper, It Works: PTO Online Platforms | Brazil

November 23rd, 2013 by Danny Grajales Pérez y Soto

Brazil gets into the regional trend of digitalization.

Brazil Online Filing Trademarks Patents

Brazil’s Patent and Trademark Office, the INPI, has implemented and continued to expand its still recent platform for online filing and management of IP assets. This is a very important step for the Brazilian PTO, which not only manages the largest volume of IP procedures and applications in the Latin American region but also bears the largest backlog in pending applications in the region and one of the biggest among the world’s largest economies (Brazil being the 7th worldwide by GDP).

 

Trademarks.

E marcas trademarks marks brazil

The online platform for Trademark procedures, e-Marcas, launched in 2006, now handles more than 74% of all trademark applications. These online applications are processed more rapidly by the PTO and have discounted Official Fees. The INPI has stated that it is intended to reduce the trademark examination period from 18 months to 9 months by January 2015 and that Multiclass Trademark Applications will be available soon.

 

The INPI has also started to allow online applicants to choose any desired wording for the specification of products and services (up until recently the platform would only allow applicants to select from pre-approved listings). However, the deadline for implementation of this feature has been delayed and clear regulation of the new procedures has not been provided.

 

Patents.

e patentes patents brazil

Regarding Patent applications, the e-Patentes online platform was launched in 2012. And several cooperation agreements have been signed with other PTOs in the region to share information on patentability exams, such as the PROSUR cooperation system and the e-PEC platform. A significant increase in the the PTO’s staff and team of examiners has also been underway going from 112 examiners in 2005 to over 273 in 2010, and almost doubling the amount of total processed examinations in that same period. The goal is to have a team of 728 examiners by 2015. This is all aimed at reducing the length of patent procedures in Brazil to an average of 4 year, until recently the length of these procedures could go well beyond 8 years.

 

 

One of the most recent developments on the online platforms is the possibility to file almost any petition or application online. At the start of the platforms’ implementation, only new applications could be processed online. Now the system has the capacity to process:

 

i) petitions related to applications/patents;

ii) enter into the national phase of the PCT application;

iii) file a recordal of assignment or change of name or address of a patent application or a patent;

iv)  submit a request for official copies;

v)  request accelerated examination;

vi)   present statement regarding the access to Brazilian genetic resources,

vii)   request the participation in the green patent program or

viii) request a preliminary opinion on patentability.

 

 

The Big Picture.

 

The Brazilian market for Intellectual Property continues to be disproportionally big if compared to the rest of the regional market. Even the infamous Custo Brazil has not been able to slow down the vertiginous growth of the Brazilian market.

 

Trademarks Patents Applications Latin America
Regional Overview of TM and Patent Applications

 

 

PTO Information on Madrid Protocol | IP Info Nuggets

March 19th, 2013 by Danny Grajales Pérez y Soto

Mexican PTO

The Mexican PTO (the IMPI) has released a web page spreading information on the implementation of the Madrid Protocol in this country. Although only available in Spanish, the page is a useful tool for getting first-hand information on this valuable new tool.

 

Here it is: Madrid Protocol for the International Registration of Trademarks | Mexico

 

However, if you desire in-deep information or just information in English language, just go to any of our previous posts on the Protocol’s implementation in Mexico or contact us.

 

Here are our posts on the subject:

 

 

 

 

Trademark denial is struck down on constitutional grounds | Colombia

January 25th, 2013 by Danny Grajales Pérez y Soto

Constitucional action on TM matters in Colombia.

Constitucional action on TM matters in Colombia.

A recent court decision on trademark matters in Colombia has set an important record on due process for trademark registrations in this country, in deciding a constitutional action (Also known as ‘Amparo’ or ‘Tutela’ in Latin American countries) presented by our litigation department against the Colombian Trademark Office -The SIC-.

 

The case was related to a trademark application, in which the trademark registration was granted after dismissing an opposition from a third party and conducting the registrability exam that is required for all applications. The granting of the trademark registration was then appealed and, during the appeal process a new registrability exam was conducted which led the Trademark Office to reverse their decision and deny the registration of the trademark.

 

A constitutional action was brought against this decision by our litigation department, leaded by attorney Juan Sebastián Salazar, on grounds of violation of due process and the right to defense. The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, and established:

 

 

-That the Trademark office’s ability to examine the registrability of a trademark has a temporary limit (Namely, the time between publication and the moment of granting or denial) and can’t be performed in appeal proceedings.

 

Any registrability examination conducted after the granting/denial of a trademark application is a violation of due process, due to the fact that the applicant will have no opportunity to defend his/her application.

 

-When an appeal is brought against a trademark registration granting, the Trademark Office will have to limit its decision to the grounds of appeal (Although, admittedly this was long ago established in Colombia procedural law). Therefore, the existence of other similar trademarks can’t be considered by the trademark office in this procedure.

 

 

We consider this to be a landmark decision for trademark matters in Colombia, since the Trademark Office will have to acknowledge its limitations regarding trademark registrability examinations, and its obligation of respect of due process and the right to judicial defense in administrative procedures.

 

 

 

*This article was modified on February 5th to clarify that the aforementioned constitutional action is also known as Tutela or Recurso de Amparo in Latin American countries.

 

 

PTO’s new year’s resolutions: New official fees | Colombia & Argentina

January 22nd, 2013 by Danny Grajales Pérez y Soto

Official fees 2013

Small changes make a big difference in official fees.

Almost one month into 2013, changes in the schedules of fees of domestic PTOs have started. Several Latin American PTO’s have already raised or lowered their official fees for trademark and patent procedures. These changes will impact differently on each country’s IP market, depending mostly on the state of its economy. As we have stated previously in this blog and our recently published book, the IP market is specially sensitive to fluctuations in national and regional economies. Specifically, trademark trends show sensitivity to changes in consumer’s buying power; and patents are specially affected by the strentgh of a country’s productive force.

 

 

Colombia.

 

Changes in Official fees from the Colombian PTO -The SIC- have been mostly favorable for promoting IP in this country, which is in accordance with the country’s pro-IP position.

 

These are some of the most important changes (Fees are showed in Colombian pesos COP and explained in US Dollars USD, at the exchange rate of the day this post is published):

 

  • Trademark applications stayed the same, at COP$750.000 or aprox. USD$423. However, applications for collective or certification marks was raised in aprox. USD$140.
  • Furthermore, given the implementation of the Multiclass trademark registration in Colombia, filing applications in each additional class was lowered from an average of COP$600.000 to a fixed rate of COP$375.000 per additional class. An USD$128 decrease, in average.
  • Trademark renewals were increased from COP$410.000 to COP$820.000. An USD$231 change.
  • Trademark oppositions, previously at COP$315.000 are now set at COP$325.000. USD$5 of difference.
  • Patent applications are slightly down, from COP$590.000 to COP$500.000. An USD$45 change.
  • Patent examination is slightly up, from COP$490.000 to COP$530.000. An USD$20 difference.

 

 

To review the complete schedule of fees of the SIC, click here (Available in Spanish only)

 

 

 

 

Argentina.

 

The Argentinian PTO -The INPI- has raised most of its official fees, but has made no efforts in simplifying their complex schedule of fees (Or the readability of their press releases for that matter). In fact, the INPI has published two separate schedules of fees. The first one will be valid from January 7th 2013 to the 1st of July, And the second will be valid from the 1st of July to the date when new fees are published. The only difference between these two schedules of fees is a notable raise in their prices.

 

These are some of the most important changes (Fees are showed in Argentinian pesos ARS and explained in US Dollars USD, at the exchange rate of the day this post is published):

 

  • Trademark applications have gone from ARS$400 to ARS$500 in the first half of 2013. This means a raise in aprox. USD$20.
  • Trademark renewals were also raised from ARS$480 to ARS$600. An USD$25 change.
  • Trademark oppositions, previously at ARS$300 are now set at ARS$400. USD$20 of difference.
  • Patent applications are up, from ARS$1000 to ARS$1500. An USD$100 change.
  • Patent examination is up, from ARS$1000 to ARS$1200. An USD$40 difference.

 

To review the complete schedule of fees of the INPI, click here (Available in Spanish only)

 

 

Fortunately, the exchange rate of the Argentinian Peso makes these changes not that significant for foreign applicants.

 

 

 

We will continue to post on this blog as soon as new fees for each country are published, and we will update our clients on our schedule of fees for IP procedures in each country.

 

 

 

Trademark matters in Panama just got easier | Panama

December 18th, 2012 by Danny Grajales Pérez y Soto

 

Panama moves ahead in updating IP regulation.

Having a regional practice on Intellectual Property makes our firm specially sensitive to changes and differences on each country’s IP regulation. Little differences in formalities  often turn into huge differences in time and expenses. Fortunately, the current regional trend is towards greater simplicity on IP procedures, either through the implementation of the Hague Apostille Convention* or through the complete elimination of requirements for legalization/apostilles. In countries such as Colombia, documents can just be signed and send via email to your attorneys for legal representation. Other countries such as Peru and Mexico have also eliminated legalization/apostille and Chile is underway of eliminating many requirements for their POAs.

 

 

The latest country to join this trend is Panama. We previously informed about the ratification of the Trademark Law Treaty, and now, Panama has finally eliminated many of the formalities that made IP matters in the country so much more complicated if compared to other Latin American countries. Unfortunately, many of the changes made affect only Trademark Law. The domestic PTO, the DIGERPI, has stated that POAs and other documents for Patent procedures had no changes on their required formalities.

 

 

The most important of these changes are:

 

-Notarization and legalization/apostille of POAs is no longer required for Trademark matters.

 

This means that POAs will only required to be signed and sent to IP attorneys in Panama. However, it remains unclear whether if this elimination of formalities apply for all cases. In countries such as Peru and Colombia, legalization/apostille is still required for Trademark Assignments or whenever legal rights are given up. The Panamanian PTO, the DIGERPI, has stated that this matter will be subject of future regulation. In the meantine, whenever assignments or legal rights on trademark are affected, it is advisable to continue to legalize/apostille POAs for Panama.

 

-The Certificate of Incorporation will no longer be required when the applicant is a corporation.

 

The elimination of this requirement will also apply for patents.

 

-Multiclass trademark application will be allowed.

 

However, this requires regulation from the PTO, and it’s still not available. As soon as multiclass registration is allowed our portfolio for services in Panama will be duly updated.

 

-Licenses of use no longer require to be registered before the PTO. Registration of these agreements is voluntary, not mandatory.

 

-It is still possible to file an application without the POA. However, there’s still an increase in official fees when this is done.

 

-Affidavits on trademark use are still required when filing an application for trademark registration.

 

These affidavits will still need to be notarized but not legalized/apostilled.

 

 

All of these changes will surely speed up procedures for trademarks in Panama. However, regulation from the PTO is still pending. We will post on this blog as soon as new information on this matter is available.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Head on to the Madrid Protocol | Mexico

November 29th, 2012 by Danny Grajales Pérez y Soto

Mexico - Madrid Protocol

Mexico becomes third Latin American country in the Madrid System.

It is official: Mexico has formally deposited the ratification instrument of the Madrid Protocol before the World Intellectual Property Organization. This means that the Protocol will enter into force in exactly three months since the date of deposit. As we have previously stated on this blog, Mexico becomes the third Latin American country to enter the Madrid Protocol –After Colombia and Cuba– and the first major Latin American economy to do so.

 

The ratified treaty was deposited before WIPO on the 19th of November 2012, and it will enter into force on the 19th of February 2013. This leaves the Mexican PTO –The IMPI– with three months to prepare and adapt to the Protocol’s procedures. The complete list of parties to the Protocol now rises to 88.

 

 

The Mexican game rules.

 

Along with depositing the ratified treaty, Mexico has set two conditions for its entrance to the Madrid System:

 

1. The Protocol sets a 12 month period as the default time for providing notice of the provisional denial of an application. Mexico has extended it to 18 months.

 

2. Similarly to Colombia’s entrance to the Madrid System, Mexico has decided to establish “Individual Fees” for procedures in which Mexico is a designated country, especially in procedures for trademark registration, post-registration country designations and trademark renewals. This means that Official Fees for Madrid Procedures in Mexico will probably be a little higher than usual.

 

The IMPI is bound to release a new schedule of official fees, including the Individual Fees for the Madrid Protocol in the coming months. We will publish such information on this blog as soon as it’s released.

 

3. The registration of licenses before WIPO’s international registry won’t have effect in Mexico. Therefore, when licenses are awarded on an international registration that includes Mexico as a designated country, the license will also have to be registered before the Mexican PTO for it to have effects on this country.

 

 

Not everything that glitters…

 

We’ve said it before, and we’ll say it again: The Madrid Protocol is indeed a wonderful tool for easing international trademark registration, but it is not without some worrying problems. When we heard about the entrance of the Protocol in Mexico, one of the first worries that came to our mind is related to a Mexican rarity in Intellectual Property issues: Mexico does not have a procedure for Trademark Oppositions.

 

Given the rise in applications that always follows the entrance to the Madrid Protocol, this could mean that the Mexican PTO may be flooded with conflicting trademarks, starting cancellations actions against each-other and greatly increasing costs for trademark owners. Law firms with practices in Mexico –Our firm included– will have to keep a closer eye on new trademark applications, and filing amicus curiae for examinators to consider before granting trademarks conflicted to registered ones.

 

 

The entrance of the Madrid Protocol will surely make the Mexican trademark market more dynamic and accessible for trademark owners. At B&R Latin America we will also be getting ready for this new tool and will make sure to provide the best legal counseling for our clients in Mexico.

 

 

Sources:

 

WIPO

Accession to the Madrid Protocol: Mexico

Licenses on International Registries for Mexico